[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] some confirmations about Tor Metrics research
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 25/03/15 16:06, Anonymous Kyoto wrote:
> Dear Karsten,
> I am not sure whether it is right to ask you some questions about
> the Tor metrics via personal email like this, or should I ask
> through Tor-talk mailing list. So please forgive, and tell me if I
> should ask you via the public mailing list.
Well, since you asked, let's move this discussion to tor-talk@.
> ①At the footer of the paper :"Measuring the Tor Network, Evaluation
> of Client requests to the Directories". link
you wrote that "*This report is mostly superseded by report 2010-10-001. *"
> Is it a mistake because I could only find the Report 2010-11-001
> with the title: "Privacy-preserving ways to estimate the number of
> Tor users" instead of "*report 2010-10-001*"
Oops, you're right. Too many ones and zeros. Fixed.
> ②What do you think "when will be the appropriate time for
> introducing the counting-cell approach"? Because the proposal has
> been there for almost 5 years, but still has not been implemented.
Nobody is actively working on it, AFAIK. I don't expect it to happen.
> ③Is it correct to separately estimate and then take the sum of both
> "new or returning users" and "recurring users", because as far as I
> am aware to become a "recurring user", a user needs to be a "new
> user" at first?
> By summing up the two values, do you mean that the number of daily
> users consists of "new or returning users" which are those newly
> joining users, and "recurring users" which are those users keep
> using Tor since the days before? If it is the case, then please
> pass this question.
We stopped distinguishing the two user groups. Please take a look at
this more recent report:
> ④In the paper, you wrote:"Our current approach for estimating
> (recurring) daily users is based on the fact that every client
> needs to refresh its network information *every few hours* in order
> to make indistinguishable path selection decisions."
> So my question is that: "why *every few hours* but not *every one
> hour*? because to the best of my knowledge, Tor directory
> authorities publish a new consensus every one hour, and all clients
> has to follow this part in the "Tor directory protocol"
>> *Clients try to have a live consensus network-status document at
>> all times.*
> * A network-status document is "live" if the time in its
> valid-until field *
> * has not passed. *
A consensus is *fresh* for one hour but *valid* for three hours. Look
at these three fields in the most recent consensus:
valid-after 2015-03-26 10:00:00
fresh-until 2015-03-26 11:00:00
valid-until 2015-03-26 13:00:00
> Thank you so much for reading my email, I know that you are very
> busy, so I would be really grateful if you can just give me a short
> answer or even a hint where I can find the correct answers.
Questions are fine. And in this case they led to fixing a broken
reference, so thanks for asking!
All the best,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
tor-talk mailing list - email@example.com
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to