[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[tor-talk] A thought experiment on direct action
I have been wondering whether there has ever been a direct action
campaign to try to install many, many Tor exit nodes?
Inspired by PirateBox, I am thinking of something like a pre-configured
Tor exit node in a small device (plug computer, TL-WR710N, HDMI or USB
stick computer, etc). Which could then be secretly (without permission)
installed in various places (public, semi-public, private) and would
function as an exit node, using the location's internet connection.
Examples might be a hotel, a cafe, an office, a railway station, a shop,
If they became popular they might even provide enough deniability that
sympathetic people might install them on their own connections (but deny
all knowledge if trouble comes).
Of course, many would be quickly found and removed. Others might find
themselves behind restrictive firewalls. But with some stealth
capabilities some might manage to be useful for quite a long time.
There are plenty of power points hidden under unused desks, in
stairwells, behind cabinets. A label saying "State Environment
Authority Air Quality Monitoring - Do Not Remove" might be effective in
many offices. Higher tech stealth could include randomly changing MAC
address to avoid blocking. And many medium sized hotels and offices
have IT staff who are over-worked and under-paid.
All this would be very abusive of other people's paid-for Internet
connections, and very anti-social! But could it be effective as a
"civil disobedience" campaign to get authorities to permit (and even
protect) the rights of people to operate exit nodes so we wouldn't have
to steal other people's connections but could openly operate them
without harassment? Or would it just not work? Or cause a backlash?
I am interested in people's views on how to create a successful
campaign to make Tor exit nodes acceptable and common.
tor-talk mailing list - email@example.com
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to