[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] OnionBalance Hidden Service has over 1 million successful hits in just 3 days



Hello @all,

I've currently 10 processes which requests the hidden service via the
same TOR daemon. The TOR daemon receives every hour a HUP signal.
As fas as I understand my current setup doesn't help very much because
the circuits are always reused and only built new every hour after the
HUP signal. Am I correct?

~Josef

Am 08.07.2015 um 16:07 schrieb Thomas White:
> Just to expand on s7r's number, I just pulled the latest logs from the
> servers and compiled a quick breakdown of the HTTP codes, bandwidth
> etc for anyone interested:
>
> HTTP Code: 200 (OK)
> Bandwidth used (bytes): 690,400,220,422
> Hits: 4,784,288
>
>
> HTTP Code: 206 (Partial Content)
> Bandwidth used (bytes): 5,202,918
> Hits: 64
>
>
> HTTP Code: 304 (Not Modified)
> Bandwidth used (bytes): 52,059
> Hits: 259
>
>
> HTTP Code: 404 (Not Found)
> Bandwidth used (bytes): 266,053
> Hits: 611
>
>
> HTTP Code: 403 (Forbidden)
> Bandwidth used (bytes): 2,908
> Hits: 7
>
>
> HTTP Code: 408 (Request Timeout)
> Bandwidth used (bytes): 0
> Hits: 5,442
>
>
> Total bandwidth usage (bytes): 690,405,744,360 (690 GB)
>
> Total hits: 4,790,671
>
>
> Not bad for a few days work guys!
>
> T
>
>
>
>
> On 08/07/2015 03:00, s7r wrote:
> > *Numbers look good: Over 4 million hits in 7 days.*
>
> > I want again to use this opportunity to say THANK YOU to everyone
> > who is contributing and stress testing. 4 million requests tell me
> > people are putting quite some effort into it. Please continue to
> > stress test as much as you can in the next days. After I collect
> > some rendezvous circuit stats also, we will stop the test - don't
> > want to overkill the network, prefer to leave more bandwidth
> > capacity for users.
>
> > I was waiting to have some rendezvous circuit statistics as well,
> > to compare them with the hits on the webserver and have an overview
> > on the circuits stats and average number of requests per circuit.
> > Hopefully this will happen in the next days. Since you asked, here
> > are the exact numbers now.
>
> > The service was started 1st July 2015. Here are the counts today,
> > 8th July (little over 7 days of uptime):
>
> > Failback instance #1: 956281 Failback instance #2: 732187 Failback
> > instance #3: 837818 Failback instance #4: 768636 Failback instance
> > #5: 911546 ============================= TOTAL: 4206468
>
> > There are no significant warnings or errors - the same instances
> > are running since service first started, no reboot or application
> > restart. I am happy with how it works. As you can see we have *over
> > 4 million hits*. The number of requests per failback instance
> > confirms the load is fairly spread.
>
> > Hidden service http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion/ up and strong!
>
> > On 7/8/2015 1:48 AM, tqr2813d376cjozqap1l@tutanota.com wrote:
> >> 4. Jul 2015 22:57 by s7r@sky-ip.org <mailto:s7r@sky-ip.org>:
>
> >> After little over 3 days of uptime, the OnionBalance hidden
> >> service http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion
> >> <http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion/> was successfully accessed over 1
> >>  Million times. There was no complaint in any of the running Tor
> >> instance s.
>
>
>
> >> Hey s7r, things still looking OK? How are the numbers now?
>
>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk