[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Forced Decrypt: US Judge Jails Defendant Six Months for Contempt re Phone Unlock
- From: "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward AT gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Forced Decrypt: US Judge Jails Defendant Six Months for Contempt re Phone Unlock
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:53:20 -0500
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=NQaOTZat; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cypherpunks-bounces AT lists.cpunks.org designates 65.50.255.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cypherpunks-bounces AT lists.cpunks.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :delivered-to:arc-authentication-results; bh=w8u+Lh9xPBKkD8yuwWPuRIrZ0kAepPcBjvM1NyEynUE=; b=LWgEEue1VIAXLemJBSscWgAitvIbPjZ7/nKLKrtJg8KpHe3DW0bn5UCkSE6dGMsxgP zuCsFi0S6rD/DILnE5ij9nglyDai1hiMTWc474arKp/KAwq0G9TeozqWl0vAQK3kjVC8 /eUjHvKNvIdp4EUtL2enorEk/dQapGy1t2vtF5EUUjf9LrYJjqOmknzxq6AA6VX1x+tp jwJzskQOetqDXH9VgAnaC1kmGck1YyfYmNxgBiw5n5udl8V15W9oRMLrxpjqlyrWVROQ FjTZyRP5g0MDUKjO6LoWO9gt5M7Pyw+hwCHZlB2Gl5DKZUq3dYIw8xSMy8Zu0iSeBa94 OhJQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531950897; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FTrp3gZyvJgMmND2HOBETpEtDAJk5Epwa7Q0p40ZioIVonHVNVG1cFbpuw9DT7FZ6m ABR0pKWbPDutSdQRd5eWEo89HkBOz6T90hQfMZcmcRTVJGMFAbB04OsQn+CYCV7DpRQc GrnIpHdMG+5R6DZAAHcEoxl7Eyh+W2t8rVaZnWmJIyowYl/gjobtlsNoOOD7H3fIYgED 1RtoM7GbDXdrMEJfYYxuSMvIT5EwPWoVB2kL2yH9vjaXhIsaMYKsz2fE4vgcwVUNpOKE DrPbykIF3EKrBavx4AyFRfGjntvLZ47DvYOwAETaeUKe3UNRupZ06azzQvgl8Y6CSqRv d/xA==
- Cc: cp <cypherpunks AT cpunks.org>
- List-archive: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/>
- Sender: "cypherpunks" <cypherpunks-bounces AT lists.cpunks.org>
- To: juan <juan.g71 AT gmail.com>
Cynicism has it's place....
But it ends at the point you need to make a choice.
It's your choice.
Marcos
On 7/18/18, juan <juan.g71 AT gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:25:22 -0500
> "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> If someone's being wrongly imprisoned (so-called "illegal" "aliens")
>> or murdered by the American government, then people need to file
>> charges against them.
>
> you mean, subhumans (that's how your govt sees non US tax cattle) will
> chalenge the nazis who are jailing them in the nazis courts?
>
>
>
>>
>> >> Conspiracy theory: who? the Jewish mafia, the italian mafia, the
>> >> Irish mafia? Who? You think they get along enough to coordinate all
>> >> of their plots?
>> >
>> > The mafia I was referring to in my previous message is the criminal
>> > organization you call "USA government" - your employers.
>>
>> Then, just call it "the System" -- it's been known for decades.
>
>
> it's your government, the more succesful and ruthless mafia that has
> outcompeted the other mafias. Also, that's the nature of (your) governments
> since the beginning of history.
>
>>
>> > Now you can go back to sucking the cock of judge smith while judge
>> > jakobo
>> > goldberg rapes you in the ass. Have fun 'charging' them.
>>
>> It is very easy to charge judges,
>
>
> no it is not, and even if you charge them with anything, it is pointless.
> Unless you want to end up in jail or dead. Is that your plan?
>
>
>
>> except those of the Supreme Court --
>> get a higher-level executive to charge them. If that's not available,
>> get a congressman/woman to charge them.
>
> I think you would be exterminated as soon as you try to approach any
> 'congress'scumbag or 'congress'cunt. Or alternatively you would be able to
> send them a fax, so they can use the your fax to wipe their ass.
>
>
>
>> A county commissioner can
>> charge a lower-level judge with "case fraud", for example and pull the
>> lower-level judge into a county court for trial.
>
>
> you mean a 'trial' in 'courts' of mock 'justice' of the people you are
> disagreeing with?
>
>
>