[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: We must preserve the Cypherpunks Mailing List archives! IMPORTANT!
- From: juan <juan.g71 AT gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: We must preserve the Cypherpunks Mailing List archives! IMPORTANT!
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:40:58 -0300
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YTLv5dl9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cypherpunks-bounces AT lists.cpunks.org designates 65.50.255.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cypherpunks-bounces AT lists.cpunks.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:date:message-id :dkim-signature:delivered-to:arc-authentication-results; bh=tPScEswfsgi6oPxQAORNG0SbAdF7Q4kIe5mmuOXXJvk=; b=HgHWvZ0em9nIhxFQfzEaSLlHODKoc9vaWWNu+W/o/W/mfrM0FdYcOMhQCrUk3bhh6x Zt/5weuH09fpJTnpyYwgcsjf0Dc+Zl0qC+mBcCQ+ZRb9a+EM1Q/QobaOzJEKcMzCV8kp 4qjYluW2HrdSn+w2EFIzZ6Vw3xmY41cxp+xrGJZur6U/foA/v1WXBX7vPi3N4TQpynIe lbwR+VN9NtDaB4pUTw6KRRq4qa4IG55FNskcgYMOfBdHd5xLQ8i/3uVbhGWUPCjIXMbk cidAZW4VaZBaYM9lrh5ZLC/E4AVk4Bzfyc0sBg64KY9zEYlevlQJdZDzbw4eQxX0nSO5 AtqQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530909485; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jz/FvGz3nxB7BtPjTaoZLgVBbHuCoHkAIw8nmz6luLf5X6gZqP07t4kN8kmIFFr2hs T3T4GdIKat9hm0rzx1dIFgOSP7Fkrs+ase65CC4FAjS7ldR8DuY5q1PITn3ldZKTIjtP pHyyl8gUYBzuJCqA5ASyG+RBFVXIEZprUYua2d2t6VrKFx7nXvPq2WvuM2DgsV32u0q0 EPqabvoImWT8ydhzxaXjAZnu1Aj/c1+NYt2pFXhAQh4rDMqTQ2KfTtonTa/jm2bc81D9 I5RnO5gWguXsuZO+3ftnPxmecKPf6gdGuiTkcWKe9HANzn4UzqgPprTHGQfxK5mjdhcp e2LQ==
- List-archive: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/>
- Sender: "cypherpunks" <cypherpunks-bounces AT lists.cpunks.org>
- To: cypherpunks AT lists.cpunks.org
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 23:39:06 -0400
Steve Kinney <admin AT pilobilus.net> wrote:
> Seems legit except 'extract' has been chewing on the file for 45 minutes
> now without spitting out any useful bits that I can see, while 'top'
> indicates 99% of CPU cycles dedicated to the task. It's kind of
> reassuring that 'extract' reports files in "GNU tar format" were found.
> But @126 MB I would expect /most/ archive files of this size to unpack
> in way less than a minute here.
>
> amidoinitrite?
not sure about extract, I used bzip2 and tar -xf
IIRC it takes a couple of minutes to unpack in my rather old machine. Maybe your disk is almost full?
> Has anybody got a verifiably useful copy?
>
> :o)
>
>