[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Agenda
- From: juan <juan.g71 AT gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: New Agenda
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 19:54:08 -0300
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass email@example.com header.s=20161025 header.b=sNA4KQ39; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cypherpunks-bounces AT lists.cpunks.org designates 188.8.131.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cypherpunks-bounces AT lists.cpunks.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:date:message-id :dkim-signature:delivered-to:arc-authentication-results; bh=DJXFV95SReaL4PKiLK3pbraZESk3Wsr2h0Mu0cqkYI8=; b=gZb7jOLmL+IKZx0h7bY8xBlp3a9TrT0A0Kh4VY9n9sAmJ8cY4W5DL2f4cN3QdyS15+ XM5T0Mc04IUONmO2oYaEW2GjeTENSgG5iX8eUAYzLQChNCwunrLrINnUI/0iIQl4a+MM ZqcKrbdxK7hGdBnhRni5Q5T5M66Il7cYf5JET3KP1GYWvYs9JGwMVqLM2DYRmK334NpB CJJjQVJwQ0s28cy9ETgXIPH8OINuQsIn4XIQ69DgyD43OfijFaLP4/+5oSBMH3j2WQww pDTA1MJoh4MxNXIzy6y6Jzm5PsMg95lmX6HhnvQuEkEwanKNYSEUo8n8a2okgdbkcbj9 z/sw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519340134; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XBMGLUUwI8v0nft8suC0GyUlqEOjEqQG9D6UPbsHcyrLNp+BoQSpLA1BAxgDnHwldE TbRhBNCUQ6FfEPjddJ+zk/EexgZoEFB7TrcUXoQr3A8v1gl+ehWmrPj1Uuz8fJ0n91PR HyMquroVGvfcfYlTCH9yuOMddbnfvawc1jN27r8NdPdCWxIlTV+SvEWfaMOKPZSD4jTM dk/OWo4affJhBX9LRsmoa92jhdbuEFrjhvbFbXI86c5YvCCUqAC69XSvgR6u3R16VtJ7 XNkd6Jqxaic6wwshe/MVyaz9g90W1CnSlXE3pBWh9DCsu+BTGtQ5c2LLoPVMUg1HXCL9 Rtqg==
- List-archive: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/>
- Sender: "cypherpunks" <cypherpunks-bounces AT lists.cpunks.org>
- To: cp <cypherpunks AT cpunks.org>
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:31:17 -0600
"\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward AT gmail.com> wrote:
> >> You have a point, but the truth that no one wants to admit is that
> >> they don't have the resources nor the expertise to create "complete
> >> global surveillance".
> > of course they do - what do you think the 'artificial
> > intelligence' bullshit is all about?
> Dude, I've done AI -- believe me, they don't know much beyond
> keywords. Give me a break. You're still uneducated about it which
> makes you an easy victim.
okay - your first try might have been because you are
but now you are repeating the exact 'uneducated' bullshit so at
this point you can't be just stupid, your have malicious
so no, I don't believe your government propaganda of the
form "trust me! they are inept!"
> > and even without that 'neural network' bullshit, you think
> > they can't index text? Or record audio? etc etc etc
> No, the cost is too high.
thanks. I was about to made that exact point. You saved me
half the trouble.
As a matter of FUCKING, VERY IMPORTANT FACT, the price of
electronic garbage for spying keeps going down by the minute.
'Processing power' gets cheaper and cheaper by the minute while
the amount of people to surveil remains pretty much
constant. Do you get that, you 'expert' on 'artificial
intelligence' from 'mit' ?
> Once they filter all of the data with the
> best AI, they still have months of work to do which mostly ends up as
> worthless because in the end terrorists aren't using the network.
you can't be so fuking stupid? What TERRORISTS are you talking
about? There are NONE.
the target of surveillance is joe-six pack, not any 'terrists'
that only exist in the mind of fascist juedo-christian scum
from the 'developed world'.
> >> Don't get paranoid -- get educated & get HARD.
> > get educated about what? the true nature and scope of
> > surveillance and government?
> Yes, you're still living on 90's level understanding.
sure that coming from an american statist, lunatic
jew-kkkristian who has written a bunch of nonsense straight out
from the pentagon.
oh don't worry, just don't forget to "open a New Private
> And government
> you seem not to understand at all (but then neither do the