[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do




On 02/26/2017 06:20 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Henry Baker <hbaker1 AT pipeline.com>
> Date: Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 4:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad
> idea because we don't know what it will do
> To: Ian G <iang AT iang.org>
> Cc: cryptography AT metzdowd.com
>
>
> At 07:26 AM 2/25/2017, Ian G wrote:
>> Bruce Schneier has recently published an impassioned plea for a United States Federal Internet Security Agency, which would likely gain control of civilian cryptography, among many other munitions.  The essay is impassioned, it is much longer than his normal 2 pagers, which signals something - belief, preparedness, foundation?
>>
>> http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/01/the-internet-of-things-dangerous-future-bruce-schneier.html
>>

I saw this go by on my rss scroll the other day and I thought, as
Mirimir said, "He's lost it".

Rr