>Trump did not say that there was a terrorist incident in
press made that up.
>No they didn't. They reported he implied... Bloggers claimed he was
discussing a terorist incident:
That's misleading. Trump referred to SOMETHING. The biased lying MSM chose a specific classification, "terrorism", as if Trump had specifically said it.
Trump was speaking extemporaneously, which of course he has a lot of experience doing. But nevertheless, he was vague about what had happened. But the MSM decided to focus on the "terrorism" angle, precisely because they knew it was false: They knew there had been no obvious 'terrorism' incident, which made it useful to misrepresent Trump's intent.
>The Guardian for example: "Donald Trump appears to invent..."
Blaming how the media gets it wrong won't help you, Razer.
>The New York Times: " President Trump escalated his attack on
Sweden's migration policies on Monday, doubling down on his
suggestion — based on a Fox News report — that refugees in the
Scandinavian country were behind a surge in crime and terrorism."
At least that references sounds relatively accurate: There IS a "surge in crime" for which Muslim immigrants are obviously responsible.
Which WAS the subject he was discussing when he brought up that
(also non-existent) "Crime Wave" by immigrants to Sweden