[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[WAR] Fukushima conspiracy theories and facts



Whodunnit?



The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged
January 27, 2012
https://www.henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html
(Jeff Rense refused to link to this article. He thinks it is a psy-op to
absolve the nuclear industry of blame for Fukushima. Fine. But when I
posted it anyway so people could decide for themselves, he announced he
would no longer link to my site. You will no longer find my work on
Rense's site. Sad that a 10 year relationship should end in this
fashion. See, "The Hidden Jeff Rense." and "Jeff Rense Steps in It."
https://www.henrymakow.com/thehiddenjeff_rense.html
https://www.henrymakow.com/jeff_rense_steps_in_it.html
)

Former NSA analyst, Jim Stone, argues that there was no mag 9.0
earthquake. The tsunami was caused by nuclear bombs in the sea and the
Fukushima explosion and meltdown was caused by mini-nukes hidden in
cameras installed by an Israeli security firm. The motive: punish Japan
for offering to enrich Iranian uranium and straying from Illuminati
diktat. This website reserves judgment but offers this introduction by
James Farganne in the spirit of free discussion.

by James Farganne
(henrymakow.com)

When we compare the  6.8-magnitude earthquake which devastated Kobe,
Japan January 17, 1995 with Fukushima, the evidence does not stack up.

A quick Google Images search of Kobe reveals incredible destruction of
buildings, bridges, elevated highways, and other infrastructure.

The Fukushima quake, magnitude 9.0, struck about 70 km off the coast of
Japan on March 11, 2011.

It sent a 15-meter tsunami crashing over perfectly undamaged bridges,
houses, roads, and cars -- over a populace which had not been warned of
the incoming tsunami, because there was no mag 9.0 earthquake. They were
taken completely off-guard. Yet helicopters were waiting, and people all
over Japan got to watch the tsunami roll in on live TV.

What on earth was going on? Ordinarily, the Japanese people are warned
of tsunamis. Why weren't they warned? Why was there no structural
damage, no reason for them to suspect that a tsunami was coming?

The quake must have seemed like nothing special to a nation of people
who are used to quakes. In a video taken in one Tokyo newsroom during
the Fukushima quake, staff were seen to continue typing at their
computer stations, totally unfazed by it.

A 9.0-magnitude earthquake is more than 100 times stronger than a 6.8. A
9.0 should have devastated everything within a 1,000-km radius. There
  should have been widespread urban carnage, even worse than what Kobe
suffered.

Yet the Fukushima quake of 3/11/11 did not cause a single structure to
collapse.

But don't take my word for it. Go look up the helicopter footage on
YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeoHW6hj92I&feature=related
Look at the infrastructure the tsunami was crashing onto. Not
the slightest bit of damage.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2hUwFo6Vpc&feature=related
Common sense is enough to make you wonder.

Jim Stone did more than wonder. He dug up and analyzed the Japanese
seismograms. He proved there was no 9.0 quake, and no epicenter out at
sea. Instead, there were three simultaneous quakes of much lesser
magnitude, all of them inland.

The authorities lied about the 9.0 quake -- made it up out of whole
cloth. An earthquake did not cause the tsunami. There must have been
another cause.

blast door.jpgReactors Destroyed by Nukes

It turns out that the official explanation for the Fukushima reactor
explosions was bogus as well. Nuclear power containment walls are
extremely thick and strong. Hydrogen explosions could never have
destroyed them. As a historical reference, hydrogen explosions occurred
at Three Mile Island and caused no structural damage, nor even any
injuries to plant personnel.

Furthermore, Reactor Four contained no fuel on 3/11/11, and was
therefore nonoperational -- yet it exploded and was destroyed as
completely as were the other reactors that day. Reactor Four is like
Building 7 at the World Trade Center - an utter impossibility, a blatant
smoking gun. A reactor containing no fuel cannot operate; a
nonoperational reactor cannot explode unless someone explodes it. The
destruction of Reactor Four can only have been the result of sabotage.

Israeli Involvement

In February 2010, Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-mainmenu-26/asia-mainmenu-33/3016-japan-offers-to-enrich-uranium-for-iran
Soon thereafter, an Israeli firm by the name of Magna BSP secured a
contract to run security at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. They installed
oversized cameras strongly resembling gun-type nuclear weapons. There is
strong evidence that they planted Stuxnet, an Israeli computer virus
that attacks Siemens power plant control systems, and which Israel
previously used to damage Iran's nuclear program. Magna BSP also
established internet data links in the reactor cores, in blatant
violation of international nuclear regulations.

All twelve members of that security team returned to Israel in the week
before 3/11/11. In the aftermath of the disaster, the Israelis publicly
monitored the reactor cores via their illegal internet data links. Yet
no one took them to task for this.

Jim Stone Targeted for Revealing Truth

What caused the tsunami? What destroyed the reactors?

Using skills honed as a former NSA analyst with an engineering
background, Jim Stone concluded that Israel was behind the destruction
of Fukushima Daiichi. Now he is paying the price.

Stone proved that there was no 9.0-magnitude quake to cause the tsunami.
The tsunami must have been artificially induced, perhaps by an atomic
bomb placed in the Japan Trench.

The tsunami was blamed for flooding the reactors and causing the
explosions. But Stone presents compelling evidence that Israel destroyed
the Fukushima Daiichi plant by installing gun-type nuclear weapons in
the guise of security cameras, and then setting them off in the
tsunami's aftermath.

Stone demonstrates that the Stuxnet virus continues to distort sensor
readings at the disaster site to this day.

Unlike many others in the world of whistle blowers, Stone bases his
conclusions on hard evidence and unassailable logic. Anyone can review
and challenge his work. He is open to it.

Since releasing his report and making several radio appearances to
support it, Jim Stone has been harassed, threatened, unlawfully
detained, and is currently facing prison time on completely trumped-up
charges.

I have watched the reaction to his work on the net. Some have slandered
him. Others have railroaded his work.

No one has debunked him yet.

His conclusions have ramifications that make 9/11 pale in significance.

Why, all across the alternative media, this roaring silence on the work
of Jim Stone?

Why haven't more truth sites simply linked to his report, directing
people to review the evidence and decide for themselves?

Some have expressed suspicion that Stone might not be what he claims to
be. That's irrelevant. Facts are facts. The report stands on facts.

If you haven't done so yet, I urge you to study Jim Stone's Fukushima
report. It is well worth the considerable time and effort. Then, if you
agree that his conclusions are correct, please do your part in spreading
this information and dispelling the alternative media's silence on it.

To conclude, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake never happened in Japan on 3/11;
the tsunami must have been artificially induced. Nor did hydrogen
explosions obliterate containment walls of concrete and rebar several
feet thick. The official story is impossible. Israel was punishing
Japan, and Zionist operatives now are attempting to destroy Jim Stone,
the man who exposed the truth.

--

The original report: www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html

Interview with visuals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G9QlynPBcQ