[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the most annoying thing about Juan



On 07/20/2016 12:16 PM, Sean Lynch wrote:


So you're saying you'd do business with someone that several people said robbed them?

Depends on who those people are, and if they're not willing to confront the person BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY (in this case meaning get the cops), I ABSOLUTELY assume bullshit.

You can say whatever you like, but if you can take action, especially action that isn't going to get you 30-90 days or longer for dotting someone's i, and you don't...

You're a punk.

Rr


On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:27 AM Александр <afalex169@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-07-20 20:32 GMT+03:00 Rayzer <rayzer@riseup.net>:
Sorry Passion is no excuse for rumor-mongering.
I just happen to know WAY TOO MANY PEOPLE who have been falsely accused like this.
+1!


Innocent until proven guilty. That's the way it's supposed to work in 'Merica.
that's the way it MUST work in any normal society/person's head. Otherwise it's medieval inquisition. Period.

So you're saying you'd do business with someone that several people said robbed them? Let an accused child molester be alone with your kids because they were never convicted?

There are different standards of proof for different functions. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is not necessary for "we don't want this person associated with our project/company/etc". No standard whatsoever is required for an individual deciding with whom to do business, who to trust to watch their kids or housesit, etc.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature