[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:44:16 +0300
Georgi Guninski <email@example.com> wrote:
> Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives and move
> to something allegedly better?
We need to get rid of tor first. Resources wasted on tor are
resources that can't be used in good projects.
> Certainly some advanced attack and/or backdoor will screw them all.
> For a start, I would like to know:
> 1. What are alternatives to tor (possibly with less functionality)?
> 2. Is the alternative known to be in bed with shady stuff like TLAs?
> 3. Did they have braindamaged bugs (like debian's openssl memset())?
> 4. What is their security/anonymity bug history?
> 5. To what attacks they are known to be vulnerable?
> 6. To what attacks they are conjectured to be immune?
> As an aside, I heard critique of Riffle: MIT are allegedly in bed with
> USA. Don't know it this makes sense or not.
Of course it does. As a matter of fact tor cunts dingledine and
syverson are part of mit, or part of mit projects like