[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Moon landing again - Fw: Neil Armstrong's Boots




On 07/12/2016 07:07 AM, Tom wrote:
>>> No atmosphere, no blowing.
>> He's talking about the module thrusters, you don't need
>> atmosphere to blow particles on the ground.
> Ok. It's been debunked anyway:
> http://space.stackexchange.com/questions/1691/why-didnt-the-apollo-11-lander-blow-the-dust-away-or-why-does-it-look-like-it
>
>
> - Tom
>


Well I stand corrected. It was the "Electrical opposite" of what I
stated in my last post.

Positive Ionic charge, not negative.


Rr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature