[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wikileaks is the Endgame
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 21:07:22 -0600
Mirimir <email@example.com> wrote:
> As I said, your reading comprehension sucks.
No it doesn't. I explained that given the 'context' my
reading is quite valid. Looks like your writing sucks.
> Or you're just twisting
> shit to pretend that you're right.
I am right. And you admited that anonimity systems don't work.
> > So you say that 'anonimity systems' *may eventually* reduce
> > state power, from which it follows that RIGHT NOW, THEY
> > DON'T. And you further acknowledge that such reduction seems
> > like a dream.
> > So you basically conceded my point. I simply reading your
> > allegedly 'general' comment in a way that underscores the
> > fact that tor doesn't work.
> It works for many people.
What a fucktard you are. It's clear again that your writing
"I also believe that they may eventually reduce state power
So they don't work
"It works for many people."
So you contadicted yourself. But don' worry. You got it right
the first time. Anonimity systems don't work.
> > Would *working* anonimity systems reduce state power? Likely
> > yes. Do the current anonimity systems reduce state power?
> > No. Especially tor, a creation of the state.
> So you keep saying.
Because it is correct.
> >> It's about anonymity systems generally. That's what you're
> >> apparently saying is bullshit. Or have I misread you?
> > Anonimity systems in general include tor in particular.
> Yes, but statements about anonymity systems generally aren't limited
> to Tor.
But tor is 'the best'. So if even 'the best' is a failure, then
the rest of systems are going to be even more of a failure.
That's like the A of the ABC of basic logic.
> >> But right now, Tor is the best we have.
> > Yeah. You said so a couple of times...
> >> So we use it, with suitable
> >> precautions. Or we play naked. What else do you suggest?
> > I suggest you stop using the pronoun 'we'. *You* find the
> > 'free' tax-funded pentagon's 'anonimity' network useful and
> > apparently don't care much about the real price of the system.
> No, I don't care about the "real price of the system". Why should I?
Right. You are a 'nihilist' eh? As long as you can buy dmt it's
OK for the pentagon to fuck as many people as they can.
> And, as I said before, people that you hate would be using any
> effective anonymity system. So you might as well get over it.
grarpamp replied to that particular piece of bullshit.
> > I further suggest that anybody interested in freedom stay
> > away from the pentagon. Doubly so if they are cypherpunk
> > 'anarchists' or sympathetic to the cause.
> The Pentagon is everywhere, dude ;)